Tuesday, January 20, 2004
 What are we Blogging for?!? ... How about a detailed response to Bush's State of the Union?

As I watched Bush’s State of the Union address, I realized that, if what Bush said was true, we would be living in a nearly utopian society with a visionary President.  But, of course, this is not the case.  Many of the statements/promises/goals and agendas set forth by Bush would look a lot different if full information were known about what Bush was actually proposing, rather than a one or two sentence, rosy sounding, blurb.

I thought to myself that I wished that there was a comprehensive response to Bush’s State of the Union.  Not a simple, Bush is wrong or exagerrating and here’s why, but something with sources, citations, etc.  Something that the casual political observer would never read, but that, if it existed, would have a power, it would be a source and it might change some things.

Then I thought to myself.  Why not?  Why can’t we have this.  I don’t have the knowledge or information (or time) to research and point out Bush’s inacuracies, but there are those in the internet universe who have this information on specific issues, policies, proposals and laws.  Why can’t we work together and get something like this formed? 

Dubya • (7) Comments • (0) TrackbacksPermalink


 What are we Blogging for?!? ... How about a detailed response to Bush's State of the Union?

As I watched Bush’s State of the Union address, I realized that, if what Bush said was true, we would be living in a nearly utopian society with a visionary President.  But, of course, this is not the case.  Many of the statements/promises/goals and agendas set forth by Bush would look a lot different if full information were known about what Bush was actually proposing, rather than a one or two sentence, rosy sounding, blurb.

I thought to myself that I wished that there was a comprehensive response to Bush’s State of the Union.  Not a simple, Bush is wrong or exagerrating and here’s why, but something with sources, citations, etc.  Something that the casual political observer would never read, but that, if it existed, would have a power, it would be a source and it might change some things.

Then I thought to myself.  Why not?  Why can’t we have this.  I don’t have the knowledge or information (or time) to research and point out Bush’s inacuracies, but there are those in the internet universe who have this information on specific issues, policies, proposals and laws.  Why can’t we work together and get something like this formed? 

Dubya • (7) Comments • (0) TrackbacksPermalink


Page 1 of 1 pages

Get Firefox!

Charles Star's Gigs

Charles Is Busy

"Where I am when I'm not here"

The Green Room

"That's a hell of an act. What do you call yourselves?"

The Usual Suspects

Everyone comes to Rick's. This is where Rick goes.

The Game Room

"I am shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!"

The "Real" Rick's Cafe

Categories

Monthly Archives

Recently

Syndicate The Cafe

Syndicate The Grovel

Join Charles' Mailing List

Search


Advanced Search

Powered by: ExpressionEngine


Statistics

Page Views: 2630373
Page rendered in 4.6701 seconds
56 queries executed
Debug mode is on
Total Entries: 854
Total Comments: 1600
Total Trackbacks: 85
Most Recent Entry: 01/07/2009 02:18 pm
Most Recent Comment on: 01/05/2009 02:33 am
Total Members: 3
Total Logged in members: 0
Total guests: 13
Total anonymous users: 0
Most Recent Visitor on: 01/08/2009 06:07 pm
Most visitors ever: 392 on 12/12/2004 07:51 pm