While Okrent is getting all kinds of good pub, its not at all clear that the NYT is willing to correct the errors he points out. This is what a correction should look like: A fast review, an analysis of the source of the error, an apology to the readership. (And the pleasant surprise of a link to an appreciative reader. Many thanks, Daniel.)
The more important part of the post was the March for Women’s Lives, so do your part.